Table 4 Comparison of the functional enrichment of protein complexes identified by LF-PIN and other algorithms (for S.cerevisia e)
From: Identifying protein complexes based on density and modularity in protein-protein interaction network
Algorithms | <E-10 | [E-10,E-5] | [E-5, 0.01] | ≥0.01 insignificant | <0.01 significant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LF-PIN | 63(21.2%) | 93(31.3%) | 103(34.7%) | 38(12.8%) | 259(87.2%) |
CMC | 73(6.5%) | 191(16.9%) | 292(25.9%) | 574(50.8%) | 556(49.2%) |
Core-Attachment | 76(5.6%) | 122(9.0%) | 287(21.1%) | 873(64.3%) | 485(35.7%) |
CPM | 25(12.7%) | 49(24.9%) | 42(21.3%) | 81(41.1%) | 116(58.9%) |
DPClus | 42(3.5%) | 155(12.9%) | 329(27.4%) | 674(56.2%) | 526(43.8%) |
HC-PIN | 40(15.1%) | 42(15.9%) | 84(31.7%) | 99(37.4%) | 166(62.6%) |
MCL | 54(5.8%) | 114(12.3%) | 239(25.7%) | 522(56.2%) | 407(43.8%) |
NFC | 63(21.2%) | 81(15.6%) | 124(23.9%) | 266(51.3%) | 259(87.2%) |