Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Systems biology combining human- and animal-data miRNA and mRNA data identifies new targets in ureteropelvic junction obstruction

BMC Systems Biology volume 11, Article number: 31 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Although renal fibrosis and inflammation have shown to be involved in the pathophysiology of obstructive nephropathies, molecular mechanisms underlying evolution of these processes remain undetermined. In an attempt towards improved understanding of obstructive nephropathy and improved translatability of the results to clinical practice we have developed a systems biology approach combining omics data of both human and mouse obstructive nephropathy.

Results

We have studied in parallel the urinary miRNome of infants with ureteropelvic junction obstruction and the kidney tissue miRNome and transcriptome of the corresponding neonatal partial unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) mouse model. Several hundreds of miRNAs and mRNAs displayed changed abundance during disease. Combination of miRNAs in both species and associated mRNAs let to the prioritization of five miRNAs and 35 mRNAs associated to disease. In vitro and in vivo validation identified consistent dysregulation of let-7a-5p and miR-29-3p and new potential targets, E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase (DTX4) and neuron navigator 1 (NAV1), potentially involved in fibrotic processes, in obstructive nephropathy in both human and mice that would not be identified otherwise.

Conclusions

Our study is the first to correlate a mouse model of neonatal partial UUO with human UPJ obstruction in a comprehensive systems biology analysis. Our data revealed let-7a and miR-29b as molecules potentially involved in the development of fibrosis in UPJ obstruction via the control of DTX4 in both man and mice that would not be identified otherwise.

Background

Congenital obstructive nephropathy is the main cause of end stage renal disease (ESRD) in children [1]. This contrasts sharply with adult ESRD, which for the greater part originates from type II diabetes and hypertension [2]. The most frequent cause of congenital urinary tract obstruction is ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction with an estimated incidence of one in 1000–1500 [3]. The spectrum of renal abnormalities varies greatly in UPJ obstruction ranging from subtle changes such as modified proximal or tubular size, chronic tubulointerstitial injury, glomerulosclerosis, fibrosis, aberration of nephron development and in severe cases (less than 1%) renal dysplasia [4]. The gold standard in diagnosis of UPJ is by prenatal ultrasonography with subsequent evaluation in the postnatal period [5]. However, this method is not sensitive enough to accurately estimate renal function and functioning nephron number [6]. This has led to an urgent need for the development of biomarkers to assess the severity of UPJ obstruction and to help the clinicians to decide if and when pyeloplasty is required [5, 7].

Due to the fact that limited human kidney samples are available, almost all observations on the pathophysiology of UPJ obstruction are based on animal models, which potentially limit the transferability of the observations in the clinical context. As a consequence, the pathophysiological mechanisms of UPJ obstruction remain incompletely understood. Renal lesions in UPJ obstruction have been described including tubular proliferation/apoptosis, renin-angiotensin system activation, inflammation, and fibrosis [4, 5, 8, 9]. Interstitial fibrosis is a late consequence of congenital UPJ obstruction, and can be attenuated by early release of obstruction, but not if nephron number is reduced [10]. It is becoming increasingly clear that patients with congenital urinary tract obstruction must be followed into adulthood, as the lesions can progress over the entire life [2].

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs (20–24 nt) that regulate gene expression by blocking the translation of proteins and are involved in multiple molecular pathways and pathologies. MiRNAs are now considered promising molecules for biomarkers and/or targeted therapy of disease [11–14]. While, kidney diseases are no exception [15, 16], to our knowledge no studies specifically report miRNAs related to UPJ obstruction. There is evidence connecting dysregulated miRNAs including miR-21 and miR-29 with kidney fibrosis [17–22], an important feature in severe UPJ obstruction. Moreover, knock-down of DICER (the main protein involved in the biogenesis of miRNAs [23, 24]) leads to congenital anomalies of the kidney and the urinary tract (CAKUT) in mice [25]. MiRNAs are very stable in urine, a biofluid which can be collected non-invasively and can be valuable source of molecules to monitor diseases of the kidney and urinary tract [16]. These observations suggest that studying miRNAs in UPJ obstruction might help to understand the development of obstructive nephropathy and/or provide early markers of pathological obstruction.

In this study, we analysed the modification of urinary miRNAs in UPJ obstruction. To improve upon the clinical translatability of our results and compensate for the lack of tissue availability in human disease, we combined miRNA data obtained in human urine and miRNA and mRNA data in kidney tissue of a neonatal partial unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) mouse model. This combined systems biology-based approach followed by an in vitro validation pointed to the consistent dysregulation of specific miRNAs, let-7a-5p and miR-29-3p and to new potential targets, E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase (DTX4) and neuron navigator 1 (NAV1) in UPJ obstruction that would not be identified otherwise.

Results

MiRNA abundance changes in urine of newborns with UPJ obstruction

A total of 20 male UPJ obstruction patients and eight male healthy age-matched (<1 year-old) individuals were studied (Table 1). The severity of the obstruction varied with hydronephrosis grades from 1 to 4 and pelvic dilatation sizes from 6 to 40 mm (Table 1). We compared the urinary miRNA abundance of UPJ obstruction patients to urine of healthy controls using microarray analysis. This yielded the identification of 227 miRNAs with changed urinary abundance between the two groups (unadjusted p < 0.05, Additional file 1).

Table 1 Clinical data of the human UPJ obstruction patients
Full size table

MiRNA and mRNA expression changes in renal tissue of a neonatal partial UUO mouse model

The renal miRNA and mRNA profiles of nine neonatal mice with partial UUO (hydronephrosis grades 2 and 3) and nine control sham operated mice were studied using microarray analysis (Table 2). This led to the identification of 79 differentially expressed miRNAs and 706 differentially expressed mRNAs, respectively (unadjusted p < 0.05, Additional files 2 and 3).

Table 2 Experimental data of the partial UUO model animals
Full size table

Identification of most prominent dysregulated miRNAs commonly associated with obstructive nephropathy in humans and mice

To prioritize the molecular features with potentially the highest impact on the development of kidney lesions, we next identified the miRNAs that could consistently reflect the human disease by comparing the similarity of the human (urine) and animal (kidney tissue) miRNA signature taking advantage from the fact that miRNAs are well conserved between species [26]. The 227 differentially expressed human miRNAs and 79 differentially expressed mouse miRNAs were combined. This led to the identification of 18 common miRNAs (Additional file 4) that were reduced to five miRNAs when applying a fold change threshold of 2.5 in mice tissue. These five miRNAs were let-7a-5p miR-16-5p, miR-29b-3p, miR-125b-5p and miR-26a-5p (Table 3). Correlation of the urinary abundance of the five miRNAs in UPJ patients with clinical parameters showed that miR-125-5p was inversely correlated with hydronephrosis grade (spearman r = −0,63, p = 0,003, Table 4). In addition, a slight but significant inverse correlation with pelvic diameter was also observed for miR-let-7a-5p and miR-125-5p and with hydronephrosis grade for miR-let-7a-5p and miR-26a-5p, and a slight but significant positive correlation with age for miR-let-7a-5p and miR-16-5p (Table 4).

Table 3 Most prominent dysregulated miRNAs commonly associated to the partial UUO model and human UPJ obstruction
Full size table
Table 4 Correlation of the urinary abundance of the five miRNAs in UPJ patients with clinical parameters
Full size table

Identification of most prominent dysregulated pathways and mRNA targets in obstructive nephropathy

Seven hundred six differentially expressed mRNAs were observed in kidneys of neonatal mice with partial UUO, including increased expression of markers of fibrosis such as Tgf-β1 and different forms of collagen (Additional file 3). To prioritize the mRNA targets, the five selected common miRNAs in mice and human obstructive nephropathy were combined with these 706 differentially expressed mRNAs using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA).

Then, we focused on the direct connections of the five miRNAs as generated from the predicted networks from IPA analysis. This led to the identification of 35 predicted target mRNAs for these five miRNAs (Additional files 5, 6, 7 and 8). Next, in order to focus on the most prominent molecular changes, only mRNAs predicted to be targeted by at least two of the five miRNAs were kept for further analysis: E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DXT4 (Dtx4), leiomodin-1 (Lmod1), a disintegrin-like and metallopeptidase (reprolysin type) with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 19 (Adamts19) and neuron navigator 1 (Nav1) (Table 5, Additional file 5).

Table 5 Most prominent deregulated mRNA targets in obstructive nephropathy
Full size table

MiRNA knockdown leads to dysregulated expression of the mRNA targets in renal cells in vitro

To validate the results of the in silico analysis, we next assessed whether the predicted miRNA-mRNA target pairs were directly associated in human renal cells. Human kidney cells (HK2) were treated for 48 h with chemically modified molecules blocking the action of specific miRNA (antagomirs). In the presence of antagomirs, the detected signal of let-7a, miR-16-5p, miR-125b-5p, miR-26a-5p and miR-29b-3p was significantly decreased (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Selected miRNA expression in response to antagomirs in vitro. Expression of let-7a (a), miR-125b-5p (b), miR-16-5p (c), miR-26a-5p (d) and miR-29b-3p (e) was assessed by RT-PCR in HK2 cells treated or not with antagomirs. Cont: control; Antag: antagomir. *p < 0.05 versus Cont

Full size image

MRNA expression of let-7a and miR-125b-3p target DTX4 was significantly increased in response to downregulation of let-7a but was unmodified by antagomir anti-miR-125b-3p (Fig. 2a). Moreover, significant upregulation of neuron navigator 1 NAV1 was observed in HK2 cells treated with the miR-29b-3p antagomir (Fig. 2d). Surprisingly, the use of antagomirs for miR-125b-5p and miR-26a-5p resulted in slight but significant downregulation of LMOD1, ADAMTS19 and NAV1 (Fig. 2b–d), a result opposite than the predicted regulation, which possibly indicates an indirect mechanism of effect of these two miRNAs on these targets. Antagomirs for miR-125b-5p, miR-16-5p and miR-29b-3p showed no effect on DTX4, LMOD1 and ADAMTS19, respectively (Fig. 2a–c).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Selected mRNA predicted target expression in response to antagomirs in vitro. Expression of E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DXT4 (DTX4) (a), leiomodin-1 (LMOD1) (b), a disintegrin-like and metallopeptidase (reprolysin type) with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 19 (ADAMTS19) (c) and neuron navigator 1 (NAV1) (d) was assessed by RT-PCR in HK2 cells treated or not with antagomirs against let-7a, miR-125b-5p, miR-16-5p, miR-26a-5p or miR-29b-3p. Cont: control; Antag: antagomir. *p < 0.05 versus Cont

Full size image

Dtx4 and Nav1 are dysregulated during complete UUO in vivo

Since obstructive nephropathy potentially induces different pathways in the developing and the adult kidney we also verified the expression of the mRNA targets in the adult mouse complete UUO model, using eight male mice with complete UUO and six sham operated mice. We demonstrated that, similarly to what we observed in partial UUO in neonatal mice, Dtx4 and Nav1 expression was significantly increased in UUO mice compared to the sham (Fig. 3a and c), while Lmod1 was not modified (Fig. 3b). The signal for Adamts19 was too weak to provide any reliable data. In addition to the targets, we also showed that the renal expression of Tgfβ and collagen 1, two markers of fibrosis, and IL-6, a marker of inflammation was significantly increased in UUO mice compared to the sham (Fig. 3d–f), validating the pathological changes observed in this model.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Selected mRNA predicted target expression in response to adult complete UUO in vivo. Renal expression of E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DXT4 (Dtx4) (a), leiomodin-1 (Lmod1) (b), neuron navigator 1 (Nav1) (c), transforming growth factor beta (Tgfb) (d), collagen 1 (Col1a1) (e), and interleukin 6 (Il6) (f) was assessed by RT-PCR in adult mice after 7 days UUO.*p < 0.05 versus Sham

Full size image

Discussion

Obstructive nephropathies, with UPJ obstruction as the prototypic obstructive nephropathy, are frequently encountered developmental anomalies in the pediatric population. Although renal fibrosis and inflammation are involved in the pathophysiology of severe UPJ obstruction, the molecular mechanisms underlying evolution of the lesions remain undetermined. In addition, most of this information has been obtained in animal models of disease. Recently discovered small non-coding RNAs called miRNAs are excreted and are stable in urine. Hence, urinary miRNAs could help to further decipher the pathophysiology of UPJ obstruction and generate the missing link between human and animal data. In this study we combined human urinary miRNA data and animal kidney tissue miRNA and mRNA data in a systems biology approach to obtain insight in the pathophysiology of the disease and improve upon the translatability of the results. The combined approach and independent validation pointed to the consistent dysregulation of specific miRNAs and to new potential targets in UPJ obstruction.

MiRNAs let-7a-5p, miR-125b-5p, miR-16-5p, miR-26a-5p and miR-29b-3p were consistently modified in mice and humans. Among these, miR-29b is a well-known player in renal pathologies and especially fibrosis. Indeed, miR-29b targets specific fibrotic molecules including collagens or α-smooth muscle actin, and its abundance is reduced in many fibrotic pathologies as its expression is inhibited by TGFβ [22, 27]. The protective role of miR-29b in fibrosis was further demonstrated in vivo since restoring miR-29b levels in a diabetic nephropathy animal model reversed accumulation of renal extracellular matrix [28]. On the other hand, to our knowledge, this is the first time that miR-16 and let-7a are associated to the development of kidney disease, as these miRNAs were mostly characterized to be involved in cancer [29–34]. Downregulation of let-7a has also been observed in scleroderma, contributing to the excessive deposition of collagen and tissue fibrosis in the skin [35]. Few data is available for miR-125b and kidney disease. Circulating miR-125b was found downregulated in chronic kidney disease (CKD) in hypertensive patients suffering from cardiovascular disease [36]. In another study upregulation of miR-125b protected against cisplatin-induced kidney injury via inhibition of Nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 [37]. MiR-26a has previously been reported to be over expressed in lung epithelia during development and to be involved in glomerular and tubular injury related to podocyte damage and maintenance of glomerular filtration rate [38]. A recent small-scale study (n = 4 UPJ obstruction patients vs n = 4 tumor-resection controls) identified in kidney tissue five miRNAs associated to UPJ obstruction. None of those overlapped with the human urinary miRNAs in our study and one, miR-342-5p, was also found in kidney tissue to be associated to obstruction in the partial neonatal mouse model, however with an opposite regulation [39].

A total of 35 putative mRNA targets for these differentially expressed miRNAs were predicted with the use of Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. In vitro validation of the predicted miRNA-mRNA pairs and in vivo assessment of the observed mRNA changes led to the sound confirmation of the regulation of E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DTX4 by let-7a. Although E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase DTX4 has not yet been found associated to obstructive nephropathy, using the Kidney & Urinary Pathway Knowledge Base (KUPKB [40],) we observed that it has been found to be induced in models of polycystic kidney disease [41, 42] and in a lupus nephritis model [43]. Furthermore, DTX4 is a member of Notch Signaling non-canonical pathway [44]. It has been described that activation of Notch signaling can lead to fibrosis [45–49]. Hence one can hypothesize that downregulation of let-7a, activates DTX4 and the Notch signaling pathway, promoting the progression of fibrosis in UPJ obstruction.

NAV1 is a protein mostly found in neurons and is reported to play a critical role in microtubule development [50], but has not yet been implicated in UPJ obstruction. Coinciding with DTX4, NAV1 expression is also induced in a model of polycystic kidney disease [41] and is induced in vitro by the major pro-fibrotic cytokine TGFβ [51], potentially linking NAV1 induction to fibrosis. It is notable, though, that the regulation of NAV1 by miR-29b-3p did not follow the classical regulation pattern (up regulation of a miRNA causes down regulation of a target or vice versa) in the partial UUO model. In contrast, in the in vitro experiment NAV1 followed the predicted regulation and confirming that it may be a direct target of miR-29b. Previous reports have documented that some miRNAs may not target mRNAs directly, but only block the protein translation, leaving the mRNA intact [52–55]. Furthermore, other reports point to the fact that miRNAs may induce the same direction of regulation of their mRNA targets depending on the timeframe and conditions [56–60], providing an explanation of a possible indirect mechanism of miR-29b-NAV1 regulation. Nevertheless, further investigation is needed to determine if NAV1 is a direct target of miR-29b in vivo and if it is an interesting molecule in the context of UPJ obstruction. Combination of the human urine miRNA data with the mouse tissue data increased the confidence in the human data and allowed selecting the most promising miRNAs in human disease. A downside of our approach is that this type of prioritization will only focus on part of the molecular mechanisms of UPJ. If signals for specific mechanisms are absent in, for example, humans due to technical limitations or absence of shedding of miRNAs in urine but not in mouse tissue, this mechanism is not necessarily irrelevant in the pathophysiology of UPJ. Another shortcoming of our study is the fact that we used unadjusted p-values. Infants with UPJ obstruction included in the study displayed a wide range of hydronephrosis (grade 1–4, Table 1) and pelvic diameter (6–40 mm, Table 1) which generates considerable variability in the UPJ obstruction group. The mean fold change after comparison of healthy controls and UPJ obstruction patients was only 1.21 fold (±0.27) in this data. This is probably due to the fact that during excretion/shedding of miRNAs in urine the in-situ miRNA changes are flattened out. Moreover, correction for multiple testing resulted in no significant miRNAs in humans. We therefore continued the prioritization with unadjusted p values but we compensated for this shortcoming by the independent validation of the selected targets. Finally, the question remains whether observations in mouse tissue or human urine are faithfully reflecting the changes in the human kidney. In the past, studies have used a similar approach as ours, i.e. by combining urine and tissue analysis, and/or by combining human and animal data, to understand the role of miRNAs in the development of renal lesions. For example, miR-21 has been found to be consistently increased in animal and human samples of both urine and kidney tissue in the context of renal fibrosis [18, 61–63]. However, during acute kidney injury, miR-21 was increased in kidney tissue and decreased in the urine in a rat model, and increased in human urine [64]. In a study of Wang et al. again in a kidney injury model, miR-10a and miR-30d were found decreased in tissue and increased in urine after injury [65]. Finally, miR-192 was observed in different studies to be up-regulated in tissue in animal model of fibrosis, but down-regulated in human tissue samples and increased in human urine samples [66–69]. These examples show that there is no common regulation pattern for miRNAs in urine and kidney and in different species, even in the same pathological context and despite the fact that their role in renal lesions has been established with confidence. But by taking advantage of the conservation ability of miRNAs, combination of urine and tissue analysis, and/or human and animal data allows to identify features that are consistently and significantly modified as being associated with the disease with more confidence and can help transfer observations from animal models to human research.

In our study, we did not observe enriched canonical pathways when studying the miRNAs of human or mouse UPJ obstruction separately even if around hundreds of miRNAs were found significantly different. Hence we have used both statistical selection, combination of different omics data (miRNA and mRNA data) and pathway enrichment analysis to identify miRNAs and their targets most likely involved in the etiology of UPJ obstruction.

Conclusion

Collectively this study is the first to correlate a mouse model of neonatal partial UUO with human UPJ obstruction in a comprehensive systems biology analysis. Our data revealed let-7a and miR-29b as molecules potentially involved in the development of fibrosis in UPJ obstruction via the control of DTX4 in both man and mice that would not be identified otherwise. We believe that our approach of combining omics data is generally applicable. Many omics studies generate long lists of differentially expressed molecules that are difficult to prioritize and does not necessarily inform on the actual impact of these changes in disease. To further improve on the validity and clinical translatability of the data, and because urine is a rich source of biomarkers that can be collected easily and non-invasively, combination of human urine and animal tissue data (e.g. miRNA, metabolites, proteins etc.) could be of great help to better understand the molecular mechanisms involved in the development of many complex diseases.

Methods

Human samples

Participants and urine collection

The studies were performed in accordance with the ethical principles in the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice and was approved by the CPP SOOM II (number DC-2008-452). Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all child participants. The UPJO group was composed of patients with grade 1 to 4 hydronephrosis and a renal pelvic diameter between 6 and 40 mm (Table 1). Urine was collected from boys (<1 year). Urine from patients was collected in the morning during 30 min using a sterile pediatric urine collection pouch (B. Braun, Boulogne, France) during hospital consultation. Samples from healthy controls were both collected in a hospital setting (from newborns with heart murmur) and at home. Immediately after collection, all urines were frozen at −20 °C and stored at −80 °C.

Mouse models

All mouse experiments were conducted in accordance with the NIH guide for the care and use of laboratory animals and were approved by the University of Virginia Animal Care and Use Committee (for the neonatal partial obstruction model) and the animal care and use committee UMS US006/INSERM, Toulouse, France (protocol number CEEA-122 2014-06/02605.01) for the complete adult obstruction model.

Both the partial neonatal and adult complete unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) mouse models have been previously described [70, 71]. Neonatal mice and adult mice were sacrificed after 5–7 and 7 days of obstruction, respectively.

Microarray analysis

Microarray analysis was carried out as described previously [72, 73]. Briefly, total RNA was extracted from kidney tissues of nine neonatal mice with partial UUO (hydronephrosis grades 2 and 3) and nine control sham operated mice. Fluorescently labeled cRNA targets were generated using the Fluorescent Linear Amplification Kit (Agilent) and 10.0 mM Cyanine 3- or 5-labeled CTP (PerkinElmer, Boston, MA), and following user’s manual. Cyanine labeled cRNA from UUO kidneys was mixed with the same amount of reverse-color cyanine-labeled cRNA from the corresponding control kidney samples and hybridized on the Agilent 44 K Mouse Whole Genome Oligonucleotide Microarray. Array hybridization, washing and scanning were performed as previously described [72, 73].

MicroRNA expression profiling was performed using the Mouse miRNA Microarray Release 15.0 (8 × 15 K, G4471A-029152, Agilent Technologies), and the Human miRNA V3 Microarray Release 12.0 (8 × 15 K, G44710C-021827, Agilent Technologies). Briefly, 100 ng of total RNA was labeled and hybridized using the commercial miRNA Microarray System with miRNA Complete and Hybridization Kit (Agilent Technologies) following manufacturer’s instructions. Array hybridization, washing, scanning, data extraction, and analyses were performed as described previously.

Cell models and antagomir treatment

Human HK-2 cells were grown in a DMEM/F-12 Nut Mix medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, USA), 10 μg/mL of EGF, 5 μg/mL of insulin, 4 pg/mL Triiodothyronine (T3), 36 ng/mL of hydrocortisone. After 24 h of FCS starvation, HK-2 cells were transfected with 5 nmol IDT® miRNA inhibitor targeting five miRNAs: hsa-let-7a-5p (ref. no 67488991), hsa-miR-125b-5p (ref. no 67488990) hsa-miR-16-5p (ref no. 67488992), hsa-miR-26a-5p (ref. no. 67488993) and hsa-miR-29b-3p (ref. no. 67488994), or with scrambled siRNA (Integrated DNA Technologies, Leuven, Belgium), using the DharmaFECT Duo transfection reagent (Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO, USA).

Gene expression analysis

Total RNA was extracted from human kidney cells (HK2 cells) and complete UUO kidney samples using the Illumina’s Epicentre MasterPure Kit (Madison, WI, USA). Reverse transcription was performed for the miRNAs with MiRCURY LNA Universal RT Kit of Exiqon (Vedbaek, Denmark) and for the mRNA with High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit of Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) on a FlexCycler2 (Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany). Quantitative PCR amplification was performed on a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Scientific Waltham, MA, USA). Sybr Green technology was used for miRNAs according to Exiqon’s kit, while for the mRNA PCR the MESA BLUE qPCR MasterMix Plus kit from Eurogentec (Liege, Belgium). The primers used for the PCR are listed in Additional file 9.

Bioinformatic analysis

Network and pathway analysis of the microarray data were performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software version 18488943 (IPA®, QIAGEN Redwood City, see http://www.Ingenuity.com).

Statistics

For the microarrays statistical analysis the freely available software Gene ARMADA was used [74]. A background correction was made for all arrays by loess correction and normalization was made by linear lowess followed by quantile normalization. The statistically different genes were the result of a t-test analysis (p-value < 0.05). The results of the qPCR for the cell cultures and the partial and complete UUO experiments were expressed in fold change units based on 2-ΔΔCt method. The graphs and the statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test between the groups with p-value < 0.05 as significant) were performed with GraphPad Prism v5.0.

Abbreviations

CAKUT:

Congenital anomalies of the kidney and the urinary tract

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

DTX4:

E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase

ESRD:

End stage renal disease

HK2:

Human kidney cells

IPA:

Ingenuity Pathway Analysis

KUPKB:

Kidney & Urinary Pathway Knowledge Base

NAV1:

Neuron navigator 1

UPJ:

Ureteropelvic junction

UUO:

Unilateral ureteral obstruction

References

  1. Warady BA, Chadha V. Chronic kidney disease in children: the global perspective. Pediatr Nephrol. 2007;22(12):1999–2009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chevalier RL. Congenital urinary tract obstruction: the long view. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2015;22(4):312–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang CP, McDill BW, Neilson JR, Joist HE, Epstein JA, Crabtree GR, Chen F. Calcineurin is required in urinary tract mesenchyme for the development of the pyeloureteral peristaltic machinery. J Clin Invest. 2004;113(7):1051–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Klein J, Gonzalez J, Miravete M, Caubet C, Chaaya R, Decramer S, Bandin F, Bascands JL, Buffin-Meyer B, Schanstra JP. Congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: human disease and animal models. Int J Exp Pathol. 2011;92(3):168–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chevalier RL. Prognostic factors and biomarkers of congenital obstructive nephropathy. Pediatr Nephrol. 2015;31(9):1411–420.

  6. Waikar SS, Betensky RA, Bonventre JV. Creatinine as the gold standard for kidney injury biomarker studies? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(11):3263–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chertin B, Pollack A, Koulikov D, Rabinowitz R, Hain D, Hadas-Halpren I, Farkas A. Conservative treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children with antenatal diagnosis of hydronephrosis: lessons learned after 16 years of follow-up. Eur Urol. 2006;49(4):734–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chevalier RL, Forbes MS, Galarreta CI, Thornhill BA. Responses of proximal tubular cells to injury in congenital renal disease: fight or flight. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014;29(4):537–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lacroix C, Caubet C, Gonzalez-de-Peredo A, Breuil B, Bouyssie D, Stella A, Garrigues L, Le Gall C, Raevel A, Massoubre A, et al. Label-free quantitative urinary proteomics identifies the arginase pathway as a new player in congenital obstructive nephropathy. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13(12):3421–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sergio M, Galarreta CI, Thornhill BA, Forbes MS, Chevalier RL. The Fate of Nephrons in Congenital Obstructive Nephropathy: Adult Recovery is Limited by Nephron Number Despite Early Release of Obstruction. J Urol. 2015;194(5):1463–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hammond SM. An overview of microRNAs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;87:3–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Almeida MI, Reis RM, Calin GA. MicroRNA history: discovery, recent applications, and next frontiers. Mutat Res. 2011;717(1–2):1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Rooij E, Kauppinen S. Development of microRNA therapeutics is coming of age. EMBO Mol Med. 2014;6(7):851–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Esteller M. Non-coding RNAs in human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(12):861–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schena FP, Serino G, Sallustio F. MicroRNAs in kidney diseases: new promising biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29(4):755–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Papadopoulos T, Belliere J, Bascands JL, Neau E, Klein J, Schanstra JP. miRNAs in urine: a mirror image of kidney disease? Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2015;15(3):361–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zarjou A, Yang S, Abraham E, Agarwal A, Liu G. Identification of a microRNA signature in renal fibrosis: role of miR-21. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011;301(4):F793–801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chau BN, Xin C, Hartner J, Ren S, Castano AP, Linn G, Li J, Tran PT, Kaimal V, Huang X, et al. MicroRNA-21 promotes fibrosis of the kidney by silencing metabolic pathways. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(121):121ra118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Glowacki F, Savary G, Gnemmi V, Buob D, Van der Hauwaert C, Lo-Guidice JM, Bouye S, Hazzan M, Pottier N, Perrais M, et al. Increased circulating miR-21 levels are associated with kidney fibrosis. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e58014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. He Y, Huang C, Lin X, Li J. MicroRNA-29 family, a crucial therapeutic target for fibrosis diseases. Biochimie. 2013;95(7):1355–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang B, Komers R, Carew R, Winbanks CE, Xu B, Herman-Edelstein M, Koh P, Thomas M, Jandeleit-Dahm K, Gregorevic P, et al. Suppression of microRNA-29 expression by TGF-beta1 promotes collagen expression and renal fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(2):252–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Qin W, Chung AC, Huang XR, Meng XM, Hui DS, Yu CM, Sung JJ, Lan HY. TGF-beta/Smad3 signaling promotes renal fibrosis by inhibiting miR-29. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(8):1462–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116(2):281–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Denzler R, Stoffel M. The Long, the Short, and the Unstructured: A Unifying Model of miRNA Biogenesis. Mol Cell. 2015;60(1):4–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bartram MP, Hohne M, Dafinger C, Volker LA, Albersmeyer M, Heiss J, Gobel H, Bronneke H, Burst V, Liebau MC, et al. Conditional loss of kidney microRNAs results in congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT). J Mol Med. 2013;91(6):739–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Griffiths-Jones S, Grocock RJ, van Dongen S, Bateman A, Enright AJ. miRBase: microRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Database issue):D140–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu JN, Chen R, Fu YH, Lin QX, Huang S, Guo LL, Zhang MZ, Deng CY, Zou X, Zhong SL, et al. Smad3 inactivation and MiR-29b upregulation mediate the effect of carvedilol on attenuating the acute myocardium infarction-induced myocardial fibrosis in rat. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e75557.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen HY, Zhong X, Huang XR, Meng XM, You Y, Chung AC, Lan HY. MicroRNA-29b inhibits diabetic nephropathy in db/db mice. Mol Ther. 2014;22(4):842–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu Y, Yin B, Zhang C, Zhou L, Fan J. Hsa-let-7a functions as a tumor suppressor in renal cell carcinoma cell lines by targeting c-myc. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;417(1):371–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dong Q, Meng P, Wang T, Qin W, Qin W, Wang F, Yuan J, Chen Z, Yang A, Wang H. MicroRNA let-7a inhibits proliferation of human prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo by targeting E2F2 and CCND2. PLoS One. 2010;5(4):e10147.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang YY, Ren T, Cai YY, He XY. MicroRNA let-7a inhibits the proliferation and invasion of nonsmall cell lung cancer cell line 95D by regulating K-Ras and HMGA2 gene expression. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2013;28(2):131–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Han J, Wang L, Wang X, Li K. Downregulation of Microrna-126 Contributes to Tumorigenesis of Squamous Tongue Cell Carcinoma via Targeting KRAS. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:522–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen D, Li Y, Yu Z, Su Z, Yu W, Li Y, Yang S, Gui Y, Ni L, Lai Y. Upregulated microRNA-16 as an oncogene in renal cell carcinoma. Mol Med Rep. 2015;12(1):1399–404.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Papadopoulos EI, Yousef GM, Scorilas A. Cytotoxic activity of sunitinib and everolimus in Caki-1 renal cancer cells is accompanied by modulations in the expression of apoptosis-related microRNA clusters and BCL2 family genes. Biomed Pharmacother. 2015;70:33–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Makino K, Jinnin M, Hirano A, Yamane K, Eto M, Kusano T, Honda N, Kajihara I, Makino T, Sakai K, et al. The downregulation of microRNA let-7a contributes to the excessive expression of type I collagen in systemic and localized scleroderma. J Immunol. 2013;190(8):3905–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen NX, Kiattisunthorn K, O’Neill KD, Chen X, Moorthi RN, Gattone 2nd VH, Allen MR, Moe SM. Decreased microRNA is involved in the vascular remodeling abnormalities in chronic kidney disease (CKD). PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64558.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Joo MS, Lee CG, Koo JH, Kim SG. miR-125b transcriptionally increased by Nrf2 inhibits AhR repressor, which protects kidney from cisplatin-induced injury. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e899.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ho J, Ng KH, Rosen S, Dostal A, Gregory RI, Kreidberg JA. Podocyte-specific loss of functional microRNAs leads to rapid glomerular and tubular injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(11):2069–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Gao W, Zhou Y, Xie J, Xu Z, Zhou L. MicroRNA expression profiling of kidney tissues in patients with congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2016;9(6):6455–61.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Klein J, Jupp S, Moulos P, Fernandez M, Buffin-Meyer B, Casemayou A, Chaaya R, Charonis A, Bascands JL, Stevens R, et al. The KUPKB: a novel Web application to access multiomics data on kidney disease. FASEB J. 2012;26(5):2145–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen WC, Tzeng YS, Li H. Gene expression in early and progression phases of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. BMC Res Notes. 2008;1:131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Dweep H, Sticht C, Kharkar A, Pandey P, Gretz N. Parallel analysis of mRNA and microRNA microarray profiles to explore functional regulatory patterns in polycystic kidney disease: using PKD/Mhm rat model. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53780.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Teramoto K, Negoro N, Kitamoto K, Iwai T, Iwao H, Okamura M, Miura K. Microarray analysis of glomerular gene expression in murine lupus nephritis. J Pharmacol Sci. 2008;106(1):56–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Viatour P, Ehmer U, Saddic LA, Dorrell C, Andersen JB, Lin C, Zmoos AF, Mazur PK, Schaffer BE, Ostermeier A, et al. Notch signaling inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma following inactivation of the RB pathway. J Exp Med. 2011;208(10):1963–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Sirin Y, Susztak K. Notch in the kidney: development and disease. J Pathol. 2012;226(2):394–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lavoz C, Droguett A, Burgos ME, Carpio DJ, Ortiz A, Egido J, Mezzano S, Ruiz-Ortega M. Translational study of the Notch pathway in hypertensive nephropathy. Nefrologia. 2014;34(3):369–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Djudjaj S, Chatziantoniou C, Raffetseder U, Guerrot D, Dussaule JC, Boor P, Kerroch M, Hanssen L, Brandt S, Dittrich A, et al. Notch-3 receptor activation drives inflammation and fibrosis following tubulointerstitial kidney injury. J Pathol. 2012;228(3):286–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sanchez-Nino MD, Ortiz A. Notch3 and kidney injury: never two without three. J Pathol. 2012;228(3):266–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sweetwyne MT, Tao J, Susztak K. Kick it up a notch: Notch signaling and kidney fibrosis. Kidney Int Suppl. 2014;4(1):91–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Martinez-Lopez MJ, Alcantara S, Mascaro C, Perez-Branguli F, Ruiz-Lozano P, Maes T, Soriano E, Buesa C. Mouse neuron navigator 1, a novel microtubule-associated protein involved in neuronal migration. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2005;28(4):599–612.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Brennan EP, Morine MJ, Walsh DW, Roxburgh SA, Lindenmeyer MT, Brazil DP, Gaora PO, Roche HM, Sadlier DM, Cohen CD, et al. Next-generation sequencing identifies TGF-beta1-associated gene expression profiles in renal epithelial cells reiterated in human diabetic nephropathy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822(4):589–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Nottrott S, Simard MJ, Richter JD. Human let-7a miRNA blocks protein production on actively translating polyribosomes. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006;13(12):1108–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Petersen CP, Bordeleau ME, Pelletier J, Sharp PA. Short RNAs repress translation after initiation in mammalian cells. Mol Cell. 2006;21(4):533–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Pillai RS, Bhattacharyya SN, Artus CG, Zoller T, Cougot N, Basyuk E, Bertrand E, Filipowicz W. Inhibition of translational initiation by Let-7 MicroRNA in human cells. Science. 2005;309(5740):1573–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Pasquinelli AE. MicroRNAs and their targets: recognition, regulation and an emerging reciprocal relationship. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(4):271–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Vasudevan S. Posttranscriptional upregulation by microRNAs. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2012;3(3):311–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Vasudevan S, Steitz JA. AU-rich-element-mediated upregulation of translation by FXR1 and Argonaute 2. Cell. 2007;128(6):1105–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Vasudevan S, Tong Y, Steitz JA. Switching from repression to activation: microRNAs can up-regulate translation. Science. 2007;318(5858):1931–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Orom UA, Nielsen FC, Lund AH. MicroRNA-10a binds the 5′UTR of ribosomal protein mRNAs and enhances their translation. Mol Cell. 2008;30(4):460–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Valinezhad Orang A, Safaralizadeh R, Kazemzadeh-Bavili M. Mechanisms of miRNA-Mediated Gene Regulation from Common Downregulation to mRNA-Specific Upregulation. Int J Genomics. 2014;2014:970607.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang G, Kwan BC, Lai FM, Chow KM, Li PK, Szeto CC. Urinary miR-21, miR-29, and miR-93: novel biomarkers of fibrosis. Am J Nephrol. 2012;36(5):412–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Hennino MF, Buob D, Van der Hauwaert C, Gnemmi V, Jomaa Z, Pottier N, Savary G, Drumez E, Noel C, Cauffiez C, et al. miR-21-5p renal expression is associated with fibrosis and renal survival in patients with IgA nephropathy. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhou Y, Xiong M, Fang L, Jiang L, Wen P, Dai C, Zhang CY, Yang J. miR-21-containing microvesicles from injured tubular epithelial cells promote tubular phenotype transition by targeting PTEN protein. Am J Pathol. 2013;183(4):1183–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Saikumar J, Hoffmann D, Kim TM, Gonzalez VR, Zhang Q, Goering PL, Brown RP, Bijol V, Park PJ, Waikar SS, et al. Expression, circulation, and excretion profile of microRNA-21, -155, and -18a following acute kidney injury. Toxicol Sci. 2012;129(2):256–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Wang N, Zhou Y, Jiang L, Li D, Yang J, Zhang CY, Zen K. Urinary microRNA-10a and microRNA-30d serve as novel, sensitive and specific biomarkers for kidney injury. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Chung AC, Huang XR, Meng X, Lan HY. miR-192 mediates TGF-beta/Smad3-driven renal fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(8):1317–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Deshpande SD, Putta S, Wang M, Lai JY, Bitzer M, Nelson RG, Lanting LL, Kato M, Natarajan R. Transforming growth factor-beta-induced cross talk between p53 and a microRNA in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes. 2013;62(9):3151–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Kato M, Dang V, Wang M, Park JT, Deshpande S, Kadam S, Mardiros A, Zhan Y, Oettgen P, Putta S, et al. TGF-beta induces acetylation of chromatin and of Ets-1 to alleviate repression of miR-192 in diabetic nephropathy. Sci Signal. 2013;6(278):ra43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Jia Y, Guan M, Zheng Z, Zhang Q, Tang C, Xu W, Xiao Z, Wang L, Xue Y. miRNAs in Urine Extracellular Vesicles as Predictors of Early-Stage Diabetic Nephropathy. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:7932765.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Thornhill BA, Forbes MS, Marcinko ES, Chevalier RL. Glomerulotubular disconnection in neonatal mice after relief of partial ureteral obstruction. Kidney Int. 2007;72(9):1103–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Klein J, Gonzalez J, Duchene J, Esposito L, Pradere JP, Neau E, Delage C, Calise D, Ahluwalia A, Carayon P, et al. Delayed blockade of the kinin B1 receptor reduces renal inflammation and fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy. FASEB J. 2009;23(1):134–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Bachvarov D, Bachvarova M, Koumangaye R, Klein J, Pesquero JB, Neau E, Bader M, Schanstra JP, Bascands JL. Renal gene expression profiling using kinin B1 and B2 receptor knockout mice reveals comparable modulation of functionally related genes. Biol Chem. 2006;387(1):15–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Faddaoui A, Bachvarova M, Plante M, Gregoire J, Renaud MC, Sebastianelli A, Gobeil S, Morin C, Macdonald E, Vanderhyden B, et al. The mannose receptor LY75 (DEC205/CD205) modulates cellular phenotype and metastatic potential of ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7:14125.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Chatziioannou A, Moulos P, Kolisis FN. Gene ARMADA: an integrated multi-analysis platform for microarray data implemented in MATLAB. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:354.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the “Clinical and system–omics for the identification of the Molecular Determinants of established Chronic Kidney Disease” (iMODE-CKD, PEOPLE-ITN-GA-2013–608332) project for TP, by the French “Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique” (PHRC) number N° 06 223 01–N° RCB 2007-A00854-49 for SD and the « Fondation du Rein sous égide de la Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale et ses partenaires », grant number GENZYME 2014 FDR-SdN/FRM for JK.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets during and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

TP, JK and JPS conceived the study, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; AC, CC and JB performed in-vitro experiments; MB, DB, JLB and BBM performed microarray experiments; DC, BAT and RLC performed animal experiments; PM and EN performed statistical analysis; SD, FCA and BB collected clinical data and banked human material. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The studies were performed in accordance with the ethical principles in the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice and was approved by the CPP SOOM II (number DC-2008-452). Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all child participants.

All mouse experiments were conducted in accordance with the NIH guide for the care and use of laboratory animals and were approved by the University of Virginia Animal Care and Use Committee (for the neonatal partial obstruction model) and the animal care and use committee UMS US006/INSERM, Toulouse, France (protocol number CEEA-122 2014-06/02605.01) for the complete adult obstruction model.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1048, Institute of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases–I2MC, 1 avenue Jean Poulhès, B.P. 84225, 31432, Toulouse Cedex 4, France

    Theofilos Papadopoulos, Audrey Casemayou, Eric Neau, Benjamin Breuil, Cécile Caubet, Julie Belliere, Benedicte Buffin-Meyer, Stéphane Decramer, Joost P. Schanstra & Julie Klein

  2. Université Toulouse III Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, France

    Theofilos Papadopoulos, Audrey Casemayou, Eric Neau, Benjamin Breuil, Cécile Caubet, Denis Calise, Julie Belliere, Benedicte Buffin-Meyer, Stéphane Decramer, Joost P. Schanstra & Julie Klein

  3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Barbara A. Thornhill & Robert L. Chevalier

  4. Department of Molecular Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada

    Barbara A. Thornhill, Magdalena Bachvarova, Robert L. Chevalier & Dimcho Bachvarov

  5. Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, L’Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Québec, Canada

    Magdalena Bachvarova & Dimcho Bachvarov

  6. HybridStat Predictive Analytics, Aiolou 19, 10551, Athens, Greece

    Panagiotis Moulos

  7. Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Biomedical Sciences Research Center ‘Alexander Fleming’, Fleming 34, 16672, Vari, Greece

    Panagiotis Moulos

  8. Service de Néphrologie–Médecine Interne–Hypertension Pédiatrique, CHU Toulouse, Hôpital des Enfants, 31059, Toulouse, France

    Stéphane Decramer

  9. Centre De Référence des Maladies Rénales Rares du Sud Ouest (SORARE), 31059, Toulouse, France

    Stéphane Decramer

  10. Unité de recherche clinique pédiatrique, Module plurithémathique pédiatrique du Centre d’Investigation Clinique Toulouse 1436 Hôpital des enfants 330 avenue de grande bretagne, 31059, Toulouse, France

    Françoise Conte Auriol

  11. DéTROI–Inserm U1188–Université de La Réunion, Diabète athérothrombose Thérapies Réunion Océan Indien, CYROI, 2, rue Maxime Rivière, 97490, Sainte Clotilde, La Réunion, France

    Jean-Loup Bascands

Authors
  1. Theofilos Papadopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Audrey Casemayou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eric Neau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Benjamin Breuil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cécile Caubet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Denis Calise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Barbara A. Thornhill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Magdalena Bachvarova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Julie Belliere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Robert L. Chevalier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Panagiotis Moulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Dimcho Bachvarov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Benedicte Buffin-Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Stéphane Decramer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Françoise Conte Auriol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Jean-Loup Bascands
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Joost P. Schanstra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Julie Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Joost P. Schanstra or Julie Klein.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Differentially expressed miRNAs in human UPJ. (XLSX 15 kb)

Additional file 2:

Differentially expressed miRNAs in mouse partial UUO. (XLSX 11 kb)

Additional file 3:

Differentially expressed mRNAs in mouse partial UUO. (XLSX 44 kb)

Additional file 4:

Common dysregulated miRNAs between human UPJ (urine) and mouse partial UUO (kidney tissue). (XLSX 9 kb)

Additional file 5:

miRNAs and their respective mRNA targets. (XLSX 12 kb)

Additional file 6:

Molecular network predicted by IPA including let-7a-5p, miR-125b-5p and miR-16-5p and possibly related to hematological and immunological disease. Red = up regulated green = down regulated; all colored genes were identified in the partial UUO mouse mRNA dataset. (JPG 355 kb)

Additional file 7:

Molecular network predicted by IPA including miR-26a-5p and miR-29b-3p and possibly related to organismal Injury and abnormalities. Red = up regulated green = down regulated; all colored genes were identified in the partial UUO mouse mRNA dataset. (JPG 318 kb)

Additional file 8:

Molecular network predicted by IPA including miR-29b-3p and possibly related to cell death and survival and connective tissue development and function. Red = up regulated green = down regulated; all colored genes were identified in the partial UUO mouse mRNA dataset. (JPG 406 kb)

Additional file 9:

Sequences of primers used. (DOCX 11 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Papadopoulos, T., Casemayou, A., Neau, E. et al. Systems biology combining human- and animal-data miRNA and mRNA data identifies new targets in ureteropelvic junction obstruction. BMC Syst Biol 11, 31 (2017). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12918-017-0411-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12918-017-0411-7

Keywords

BMC Systems Biology

ISSN: 1752-0509

Contact us