Table 5 Summary of systematic perturbation results
From: Analysis of a dynamic model of guard cell signaling reveals the stability of signal propagation
Light, CO2 and ABA condition | Unperturbed SO level | Simplified SO level | Percentage of cases with unchanged SO value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | |||||
Percentage of single knockouts that lead to each SO level | ||||||||||
Dual Beam | Mod. CO2 | ABA OFF | 5 | 4 % | 31 % | 65 % | 65 % | |||
Low CO2 | 6 | 31 % | 4 % | 65 % | 65 % | |||||
High CO2 | 1 | 4 % | 96 % | 96 % | ||||||
Blue Light | Mod. CO2 | 3 | 35 % | 65 % | 65 % | |||||
Low CO2 | 5 | 31 % | 4 % | 65 % | 65 % | |||||
High CO2 | 1 | 4 % | 96 % | 96 % | ||||||
Red Light | Mod. CO2 | 1 | 4 % | 96 % | 96 % | |||||
Low CO2 | 3 | 35 % | 65 % | 65 % | ||||||
High CO2 | 1 | 4 % | 96 % | 96 % | ||||||
Dual Beam | Mod. CO2 | ABA ON | 0 | 85 % | 4 % | 8 % | 4 % | 85 % | ||
Low CO2 | 3 | 46 % | 50 % | 4 % | 50 % | |||||
Blue Light | Mod. CO2 | 0 | 85 % | 4 % | 8 % | 4 % | 85 % | |||
Low CO2 | 3 | 46 % | 50 % | 4 % | 50 % | |||||
Red Light | Low CO2 | 0 | 96 % | 4 % | 96 % | |||||